<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patient Relationship Management (PRM)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcareitstrategy.com/2009/09/26/patient-relationship-management-prm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcareitstrategy.com/2009/09/26/patient-relationship-management-prm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://healthcareitstrategy.com/2009/09/26/patient-relationship-management-prm/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e-Patient Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcareitstrategy.com/?p=886#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIT, yes.  Math degree, no. :*ndash;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MIT, yes.  Math degree, no. :*ndash;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Roemer</title>
		<link>http://healthcareitstrategy.com/2009/09/26/patient-relationship-management-prm/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Roemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcareitstrategy.com/?p=886#comment-135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just pulling your lariat.  The one thing I hadn&#039;t counted on was having someone from MIT with a math degree reading the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just pulling your lariat.  The one thing I hadn&#8217;t counted on was having someone from MIT with a math degree reading the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://healthcareitstrategy.com/2009/09/26/patient-relationship-management-prm/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e-Patient Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcareitstrategy.com/?p=886#comment-134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, this wins my Einie Heinie for Sloppiest Relativity Metaphor of the DECADE. :) Corollary: the number of deviations is increasing with the square of time (the time I spend thinking about it). :-)

But I suspect your core point is valid, whether or not the algebra is. Hiring more call center people is brute force - in fact I bet a Six Sigma analysis would show that hiring more call center people is analogous to hiring more inspectors on a production line: if you get really good at it (as Motorola did) you don&#039;t *need* inspectors, and if you get really good at serving customers&#039; needs, you don&#039;t need a lot of phone voices.

That metaphor too has limits; in customer service sometimes the customer WANTS a voice to talk to. (Check &lt;a href=&quot;http://patientdave.blogspot.com/2009/09/dont-i-just-love-totally-screwed-up.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what happened&lt;/a&gt; with the $2,467 Verizon Wireless bill I got last night.)

So let&#039;s start with process maps and touchpoints, address the customer&#039;s use cases intelligently, and even engineer the processes to reduce the incidence of needs (e.g. erroneous phone bills). Then hire humans (intelligent ones) to handle the exceptions.

I like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this wins my Einie Heinie for Sloppiest Relativity Metaphor of the DECADE. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Corollary: the number of deviations is increasing with the square of time (the time I spend thinking about it). <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I suspect your core point is valid, whether or not the algebra is. Hiring more call center people is brute force &#8211; in fact I bet a Six Sigma analysis would show that hiring more call center people is analogous to hiring more inspectors on a production line: if you get really good at it (as Motorola did) you don&#8217;t *need* inspectors, and if you get really good at serving customers&#8217; needs, you don&#8217;t need a lot of phone voices.</p>
<p>That metaphor too has limits; in customer service sometimes the customer WANTS a voice to talk to. (Check <a href="http://patientdave.blogspot.com/2009/09/dont-i-just-love-totally-screwed-up.html" rel="nofollow">what happened</a> with the $2,467 Verizon Wireless bill I got last night.)</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s start with process maps and touchpoints, address the customer&#8217;s use cases intelligently, and even engineer the processes to reduce the incidence of needs (e.g. erroneous phone bills). Then hire humans (intelligent ones) to handle the exceptions.</p>
<p>I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

