Below is a comment on a Washington Post article on mandated coverage, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502607_Comments.html
Great movie, poor reform—at least that’s my take on how poorly the current healthcare legislation will actually work regarding a mandate. There are probably more federal judges with gangsta rap on their iPods than congressmen who have actually read the reform bill.
I call the idea of the mandate “must carry”. The only option of the public option and must carry provisions is the option to “opt”. Individuals can “opt” and so can firms. “Opt-in”, “Opt-out”—like clap-on clap-off.
However well intended it may be, as structured, the mandate will not work; neither for individuals or for firms. The individuals who will be required to carry, can opt out for a $750 annual fine and “opt” in when they are sick or injured. The fine will be less than the cost of the insurance premiums. That way, their out-of-pocket costs are actually paying co-payments not premiums.
It appears that firms may be able to pay the fines on a per person basis rather than opting to pay for healthcare insurance for their employees.
Hence, mandated coverage may only apply to those who haven’t figured out that it doesn’t apply.
