There are days when it doesn’t pay to be a serial malingerer, and when it does, the work is only part time, but I hear the benefits may be improving as I think I heard somebody mention healthcare is being reformed.
I don’t know if you are aware of it, but there are actually people who have taken an Alfred E. Newman, “What, me worry” attitude towards EHR. For the youngsters in the crowd, Alfred was the poster child for Mad Magazine, not Mad Med.
Just to be contrarian for a moment–as though that’s out of character for me–most providers have no need to fear–does this happen to you? You are writing aloud, trying to make a point, and the one thing that pops into your mind after, ‘there’s no need to fear’ is “Underdog is here.”
Anyway, since many providers haven’t begun the process, or even begun to understand the process, there is still time for them to lessen the risk of failure from an EHR perspective. Many don’t want to talk about it, the risk of failure.
Here’s another data set worth a look (The Chaos Report). They went a little PC on us calling them ‘Impaired” factors. EHR impairment. Step away from the computer if you are impaired, and take away your friend’s logon if they are. These are failure factors.
Project Impaired Factors | % of the Responses | |
1. | Incomplete Requirements | 13.1% |
2. | Lack of User Involvement | 12.4% |
3. | Lack of Resources | 10.6% |
4. | Unrealistic Expectations | 9.9% |
5. | Lack of Executive Support | 9.3% |
6. | Changing Requirements & Specifications | 8.7% |
7. | Lack of Planning | 8.1% |
8. | Didn’t Need It Any Longer | 7.5% |
9. | Lack of IT Management | 6.2% |
10. | Technology Illiteracy | 4.3% |
11. | Other | 9.9% |
My take on this is with overall “failures” so high, several respondents could have replied to “all of the above.” Also of note is that these failure reasons differ from the ones listed previously.
Who knows, maybe if we multiply them by minus one we can call them success factors.