The Dark Side versus the Blind Side

Posted by

0

My take on this is probably far-afield from the mainstream. I think the Dark-Side, firms like Google, Microsoft, and Oracle look at the confusion and lack of planning in terms of what the final EHR/PHR platform will look like and they simply drool. With hundreds of EHR vendors and RHIOs and RECs and standards groups all operating independently, all aiming at an undefined target, which group is best positioned to solve this platform problem, the Dark Side, or the Blind Side?

The Dark Side’s plans are underway and visible through their PHRs. Like the tip of an iceberg, I bet that most of what they are doing to own this space is presently unseen. Practice Fusion, if their product attracts enough customers will be devoured, or they will be ignored. RECs, RHIOs, Meaningful Use, Certification, a lack of standards, and no network are large red flags from the government saying “we don’t know where we’re going, but we’re making real good time.”

Here’s a reply I drafted at the request of Brian Ahier to his blog, http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/11/getting-personal-with-health-t.html

The Dark Side knows exactly where they’re going. They don’t need a network; they have one. The Internet. There are those who argue HIPAA and security. HIPAA and security can be more readily handled on a network that’s been up and running for twenty years and was built by the military than they would be under anything developed off the cuff under Washington’s leadership.

Now for the Deathstar issue–ownership of the data. The question is are ownership and possession one in the same? I bet they will not be. I’d also bet that five years from now somehow that Dark Side will have at least access to it. I can’t prove any of this, but I’d love to sit in on the strategic planning committees of the Dark Side. I bet some or all of this is underway. The Blind Side may be blind-sided.

HIT/EHR: A little adult supervision can’t hurt

Posted by

0

Among other things, EHR requires adult supervision like parenting.  My morning was moving along swimmingly.  Kids were almost out the door and I thought I’d get a batch of bread underway before heading out for my run.  I was at the step where you gradually add three cups of flour—I was in a hurry and dumped it all in at once.  This is when the eight-year-old hopped on the counter and turned on the mixer.  He didn’t just turn it on, he turned it ON—power level 10.

If you’ve ever been in a blizzard, you are probably familiar with the term whiteout.   On either side of the mixer sat two of my children, the dog was on the floor.  In an instant the three of them looked like they had been flocked—like the white stuff sprayed on Christmas trees—I guess we could call them evergreens—to make them look snow-covered.  (I just em-dashed and em-dash, wonder how the AP Style Book likes that.)  So, the point I was going for is that sometimes, adult supervision is required.

What exactly is Health IT, or HIT?  I may be easier asking what HIT isn’t.  One way to look at it is to consider the iPhone.  For the most part the iPhone is a phone, an email client, a camera, a web browser, and an MP3 player.  The other 85,000 things are other things that happen to interact with or reside on the device.

In order for us to implement correctly (it sounds better when you spilt the infinitive) HIT and EHR a little focus on blocking and tackling are in order.  Some write that EHR may be used to help with everything from preventing hip fractures to diagnosing the flu—you know what, so can doctor’s.  There are probably things EHR can be made to do, but that’s not what they were designed to do, not why you want one, and not why Washington wants you to want one.  No Meaningful Use bonus point will be awarded to providers who get ancillary benefits from their EHR especially if they don’t get it to do what it is supposed to do.

EHR, if done correctly, will be the most difficult, expensive, and far reaching project undertaken by a hospital.  It should prove to be at least as complicated as building a new hospital wing.  If it doesn’t, you’ve done something wrong.

EHR is not one of those efforts where one can apply tidbits of knowledge gleaned from bubblegum wrapper MBA advice like “Mongolian Horde Management” and “Everything I needed to know I learned playing dodge ball”.

There’s an expression in football that says when you pass the ball there are three possible outcomes and only one of them is good—a completion.  EHR sort of works the same, except the range of bad outcomes is much larger.

EHR: A billion for your thoughts

Posted by

0

Every wonder how it is that all the billions in healthcare IT money came about?  I imagine it went something like this.

DC 1: Email those fellows over at HHS and tell them we should just make the doctors install Electronic Health Records (EHR).

DC 2: While we’re at it, how about we pay them a bonus to do it…

DC 1: …and we penalize them if they don’t.  Give them money with one hand and take it back with the other.

DC 2: How do we get EHRs to communicate?

DC 1: Make the states do figure it out.  They are looking for more money.

DC 2: I’ll email the governors and tell them we’ve got more billions to pass around.  Let them build some sort of Information Exchange.  They can set up committees and staff them with appointees.

DC 1: Then we can glue those together in some kind of national network.  Where are we going to get one of those?  Figure another ten billion for that.

DC 2: I’ll email the DOD, they are supposed to know something about building national networks.

DC 1: Just to get things kick-started, let’s email the troops and tell them we’ll sweeten the state pots a little more.  Get them to build these extension centers on a region by region basis.

All these dollars, so little value.  Most of it focused on trying to figure out how to get millions of somethings from point A to point B.

How did all those millions of emails get securely from point A to point B?  For a lot less than forty billion dollars isn’t it possible to figure out  how to get my health information to whomever needs it?  Email me, maybe we can come up with an idea for a network.

If you’re still puzzled, we can play hangman.  It has eight letters, starts with an ‘I’, and ends with ‘ternet’.

Taking Care of Patients (TCOP)

Posted by

0

 

 

 

 

That’s me in the back row–just kidding. There are approximately 640 muscles in the human body. Yesterday I pulled 639 of them. In anticipation of the onset of winter I’ve been ramping up my workouts, and at the moment am scarcely able to lift a pencil. I came across an article that describes the full body workout used by the University of North Carolina basketball players. It involves a ten-pound medicine ball, and 400 repetitions spread across a handful of exercises. I’m three days into it and giving a lot of thought about investigating what kind of workout the UNC math team may be using. At my son’s basketball practice last night, the parents took on the boys—they are ten. That 640th muscle, the holdout, now hurts as bad as the rest of them.

So, this morning I’m running on the treadmill, because it’s cold and the slate colored clouds look heavy with rain. While I’m running, I am watching the Military History Channel, more specifically a show on the Civil War’s Battle of Bull Run—I learned that that’s what the Yankees called it, they named the battles after the nearest river, the Rebs called it the Battle of Manassas, named after the nearest town. The historian doing the narration spoke to the wholesale slaughter that occurred on both sides. He equated the slaughter to the fact that military technology had outpaced military strategy. The armies lined up close together, elbow to elbow, and marched towards cannon fire that slaughtered them. Had they spread themselves out, the technology would have been much less effective.

Don’t blink or you’ll miss the segue. You had to know this was coming. Does your hospital have one of those designer call centers? You know the ones—wide open spaces, sky lights, sterile. Fabric swatches. The fabric of the chair matches that of the cubicle, which in turn are coordinated with the carpeting. Raised floors. Zillions of dollars of technology purring away underfoot. We have technology that can answer the call, talk to the caller, route the caller, and record the caller for that all important black hole called “purposes of quality.”

The only thing we haven’t been able to do is to find technology to solve the patient’s problems. Taking Care of Patients (TCOP).  We’ve used it to automate almost everything. If we remove all the overlaying technology, we still face the same business processes that were underfoot ten years ago. Call center technology has outpaced call center strategy. Call center technology hasn’t made call centers more effective, it’s made them more efficient. Call center strategies are geared towards efficiencies. Only when we design call center strategies around being more effective will the strategy begin to maximize the capabilities of the technologies.

Patient Relationship Management: Got Pigeons?

Posted by

0

 

 

 

 

 

I was recently in a large call center of one of my clients. Supervisors and CSRs were scurrying about clearing their desks of binders and cheat sheets in an effort to make the center look paperless. I looked up just in time to see an ominous looking flock of people being given the nickel tour. They swept through in a scene reminiscent of the gathering of fowl in Hitchcock’s The Birds. In an instant we knew the flock was from corporate. The suit-people were tethered to their Blackberries and they kept glancing at their watches as though doing so was going to make lunch arrive quicker.

They encircled a cubicle, a few of them preening themselves, leaned forward, pretended to be interested in what they were being shown, nodded appropriately, scribbled down a few notes, and moved on. At one point, a few of them donned headsets to monitor a call. Within thirty minutes, it was all over, just like in the movie.

The next day the memo filtered down from corporate customer care and marketing, outlining all the new procedures the flock deemed necessary based on all the information they’d gleaned during their brief flyover.

Remember, pigeons happen.

EHR-a doctor/CMIO’s perspective

Posted by

1

Dirk Stanley wrote this in reply to a post on http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/11/converting-to-electronic-healt.html

I felt it needs to be heard.

I can only say that no matter what we do from a technical standpoint, a lot of medicine isn’t ready from the cultural standpoint.

Medical culture is a weird creature, that not a lot of people understand. (I’m sure Glenn above can attest to this.) Docs, historically, have been used to people “compensating for them”, for example :

1. A doc writing a script for Percocet (1) tab PO QID PRN instead of Percocet (1) tab PO q6h PRN pain.
2. A doc writing for “regular diet” instead of “Regular diet, dysphagia level I, nectar thickened liquids.”
3. A doc having weeks to co-sign their verbal orders.
4. A doc writing “Vanco 1gram IV x1 STAT” instead of “Vancomycin 1 gram in 250mL 0.9% NS run over 2 hours at a rate of 125mL/hour”
5. A doc writing “Heparin protocol” in the pre-EMR world, versus an electronic order for “Heparin protocol” where *all of the teammembers know what to do*.
6. A doc choosing an EMR because “It’s the best for me” versus “It’s the best thing for my patient”.

These are the hidden implementation costs. Training docs to think along these lines is important, but nobody has a clear training plan on how to change this medical culture.

This is why, some people look at OpenVista as the solution – IMHO, putting OpenVista into a private hospital will not produce the results it does in a VA hospital. Docs need to understand there will be compromises, and they need to buy-in to those compromises, before any migration to EMR will work.

Technology only works if the culture supports it.
I can tell you there are still a LOT of cynical docs out there who are quick to try a solution, and if it doesn’t work the first time, they lose faith.

Again, I wish things were different, but as a practicing physician who sees a lot of different medical computing environments (ICU to private office), I’m really concerned about the implementation plan here.

Finally, I agree, we do need an EMR Czar, or a “rockstar” who will talk about these things openly to help change the culture to be more supportive of technology. The problem is that to talk about it openly would mean having frank discussions that a lot of people don’t want to hear yet…

– Dirk 😉

Health IT: magical thinking?

Posted by

2

Below are a few thoughts I submitted to the WSJ Healthblog at http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/11/12/a-doc-warns-of-magical-thinking-on-health-it/?mod=rss_WSJBlog

 

Interesting to note that they refer to the IT as it.  That’s because healthcare IT is being approached as a solution looking for a problem.  In may respects, the problem providers are trying to solve is the one created by Washington (the city, not the 1st president) mandating EHR.
If that’s the problem a provider is trying to solve, all solutions look good.  Healthcare providers need to approach HIT and EHR as real business problems, problems that require adult supervision, thoughtful analysis, and program officers with a track record of implementing big, hairy IT projects.
What’s your take on it?

pastedGraphic.tiff.converted

 

RECs, HIEs, & EHRs: Curiouser and Curiouser

Posted by

0

Here’s a response I wrote for a very interesting conversation started by Andy Oram, though a posting, http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/11/converting-to-electronic-healt.html

I think the very existence of the Regional Extension Centers (RECS)is but another sign that there is no workable plan for a national rollout of EHR. There is a plan, a word I use reluctantly—there may be several. Several things surrounding the rollout exist that reinforce the idea that the plan is not operational—Meaningful Use, Certification, RECs—and these things exist as a series of band-aids in the hope they will enable the plan. These band-aids have been cobbled together over time and by different parties.
There is no EHR Czar.

There is no roll out czar. I defy anyone to present their work plan for how this ties together and show where these add-ons are on the plan.

Back to RECs. Similar format to Healthcare Information Exchanges (HIEs). Political in their origin and format. Carte blanche in terms of how they are built, what they will deliver, how they relate to HIEs and standards, and how the quality of their output will be measured. Five hundred and ninety-eight hope this helps million dollars. Has anyone sought out the credentials of those running the hope-this-works RECs? Does anyone doubt that they don’t have the experience to make these of any value? Where’s the national REC work plan? The individual work plans?

Who likes the REC idea? The payors. Regionally deployed and state authorized, the payors have more than a vested interest in helping the healthcare providers in their region with their EHR efforts.

This is another lipstick on the pig effort. By now, the pig is just about covered with lipstick. Does it make it a better pig? Of course not, it just makes it red.

saintlogo2

Patient Relationship Management-there are some easy answers

Posted by

0

MANUALSThere’s a reason penguins don’t play the viola—maybe that’s why they don’t have a home page. I used to try to approach things with an open mind, but people kept trying to put things like that in it. Did you ever notice that it’s difficult to encourage people to think outside the box especially if you haven’t seen evidence that the people inside the box are thinking? I’m sure there are those who think these ideas are mere snake oil, but who among you has ever seen a rusty snake?

There is often an inverse relation between the relevance of a document and its brevity. Roemer’s Law 17: the value of a patient user manual used in your call centers is approximately equal to the square root of the number of chapters. (That bit of insight is the equivalent of 4.6 raiments, where one raiment has been universally established as the amount of consulting insight needed to awe a frog for one hour.)

How many different patient user manuals are there in your patient call center? How many pages do those manuals occupy? I think user manuals are so long because call center managers believe busy people are effective people. People who aren’t busy all the time might start to think, and what good has ever come from that?

The United States Constitution is about 9,000 words—that’s about thirty pages. What is it about the interactions between patients and call center reps that requires more verbiage than the amount needed to keep 350,000,000 people living in prosperity and at peace with one another for more than 220 years?

For some people, work takes place in the fast lane. For me, it often takes place in oncoming traffic. To conclude, let’s agree to quit viewing things from the dark side of the sun. Sometimes instead of complaining about the darkness, it’s better to ignite a flame. The next time you are at your desk, open the user manuals, take out all the pages, and replace them with this one rule:

DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO SOLVE THE PATIENT’S PROBLEM.

I guarantee that will improve performance. Some executives argue that the chances of something so patently absurd actually being true are a million to one. But consultants have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten. It’s also fair to state that all mushrooms are edible, however it’s equally fair to state that some mushrooms aren’t edible more than once.

To those who want to prove me wrong, go ahead. Destroy the fabric of the universe, then call me.

saint

EHR: work plans are necessary but not sufficient

Posted by

0

114454101_a0f39220a7

 

 

 

 

I wonder about things, little things, things I see on Nova or on Bizarre Foods.  Take water, more specifically, ice.  It floats.  The only solid that floats in its liquid state.  Most solids sink, not ice.  For those of you thinking boats float, they’re not considered to be solids—does that make them liquids?

It turns out that as water goes from four degrees centigrade, its densest point, and towards freezing, it becomes less dense and floats.  It’s volume increases by 9%, and part of that 9% is trapped air.  That air, even though you can’t see it, exists between the two H’s and the O.  which takes us to the following.

Have you spent much time studying work plans?  While there are more interesting ways to spend your time, there are times meant for writing them, and times meant for studying them.

Having a work plan can be a little like having a bike; nice, practical for some things, impractical for others.  Like with most things, there are work plans and there are work plans.  Some may not be worth the paper on which they are written.

Just like not everyone can write a book worth reading, not everyone can write a work plan worth implementing.  Lines on paper don’t necessarily yield a project of much value.  Remember how with the ice there are things between the H’s and O’s?  Well, with a lot of healthcare IT and EHR work plans, there are things between the tasks on the work plan, or at least there should be.  Can’t see them either.  Those things?  The missing tasks, the tasks that should have been in the plan, the tasks that would have given the plan a fighting chance to succeed.

Some gaps are good, like with ice.  Others can leave you hanging.

saint